Help your child succeed in only 15 minutes a day.
Email:
  Join Our Newsletter  
The Phonics Plus Five Blog

« November 2008 | Main | January 2009 »

December 24, 2008

Want To Live Among People Who Like to Read?

Every year, there is a study of which cities (with populations over 250,000) offer the best "culture and resources for reading." Once again, just as they have done for the past several years, Minneapolis and Seattle top the list.

The study does not look at reading test scores or how often people read. Rather, based on six key indicators, it looks at the kinds of literary resources that are available and used. These are newspaper circulation, number of bookstores, library resources, periodical publishing resources, educational attainment and Internet resources.

The analysis suggests that, contrary to conventional wisdom, the availability of free online news is not to blame for the decline in newspapers' print circulation. For example, cities with newspapers that have relatively high circulation rates also have more people reading newspapers online. The analysis also suggests that the decline in bookstores across the country is not caused by the rise in online book buying since cities that ranked higher for having more bookstores also have a higher proportion of people buying books online. In other words, people who elect to read are likely to use whatever forms and services are available and not select one over the other.

For the nation overall, the picture is (as many critics have indicated) is not very bright. In studies of international literacy using measures such as per-capita paid newspaper circulation, the USA ranks only 31st in the world, far behind other countries, including Aruba, Liechtenstein and Japan.

Hopefully, with the nation now in a mood to give more serious consideration to its problems, we will see some positive changes in this realm in the years ahead.

The literate cities study is available online at www.ccsu.edu/amlc08

December 18, 2008

U.S. Children--Why Do They Receive So Much More Medication?

A recent study in the journal Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health reported that children in the US are about three times more likely to be prescribed psychotropic medications such as antidepressants than children in Europe.

The study, which compared children in the US, Germany and the Netherlands, said that the differences may be due to regulatory practices and cultural beliefs about medications and emotional and behavioral problems.

The study leader Julie Zito of the University of Maryland said that "Antidepressant and stimulant prevalence were three or more times greater in the United States than in the other two countries, while antipsychotic prevalence was 1.5 to 2.2 times greater."

Among the possible reasons for the differences are government cost restrictions in Europe, the larger number of child psychiatrists per capita in the United States and the use of two or more different psychotropic drugs in a single year in U.S. children. Whatever the reasons, it seems clear that parents need to be extreme watchful in this area and recognize that other nations are handling troublesome behaviors in ways that are quite different and far more conservative than those in our nation.

December 16, 2008

A Precedent from the President

Andy Borowitz, a comedian and writer, recently wrote an article titled "Obama's Use of Complete Sentences Stirs Controversy." It starts:

"Since the election, President-elect Barack Obama has broken with a tradition established over the past eight years through his controversial use of complete sentences, political observers say." It then goes on:

Millions of Americans who watched Mr. Obama's appearance on CBS's 60 Minutes witnessed the president-elect's unorthodox verbal tick, which had Mr. Obama employing grammatically correct sentences virtually every time he opened his mouth.
But Mr. Obama's decision to use complete sentences in his public pronouncements carries with it certain risks, since after the last eight years many Americans may find his odd speaking style jarring.
According to presidential historian Davis Logsdon of the University of Minnesota, some Americans might find it "alienating" to have a president who speaks English as if it were his first language.
"Every time Obama opens his mouth, his subjects and verbs are in agreement," says Mr. Logsdon. "If he keeps it up, he is running the risk of sounding like an elitist."
The historian said that if Mr. Obama insists on using complete sentences in his speeches, the public may find itself saying, "Okay, subject, predicate, subject predicate -- we get it, stop showing off."
The president-elect's stubborn insistence on using complete sentences has already attracted a rebuke from one of his harshest critics, Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska.
"Talking with complete sentences there and also too talking in a way that ordinary Americans like Joe the Plumber and Tito the Builder can't really do there, I think needing to do that isn't tapping into what Americans are needing also," she said.

For all of us interested in literacy, wow! The language of public life seems to be taking a remarkable turn.

December 07, 2008

Writing: It Can Be Done But It Has to Be Done Differently

Reading, and reading problems, get lots of attention. Not so with writing, and writing problems which receive far less time and effort. The consequences of this neglect are serious—as many discover once they leave college and try to move up the career ladder. Skilled writing is an enormous advantage for both academic and job success.

In the desert landscape of writing instruction in schools, one form stands out. It goes by the name of “journal writing.”

A product of the whole language movement, daily or near daily, journal writing occurs throughout the nation in the primary grades. It is based on the idea that children’s interest in writing would be increased and their skills would be enhanced if they were to write about their own experiences—experiences that were "meaningful" to them.

Exposure to this type of writing occurs even in the earliest years---even in kindergarten. There it takes the form of encouraging the youngsters to draw a picture of something in their lives and then put down whatever words they can to go along with the drawing.

Those who are familiar with invented spelling (another product of whole language) can easily see the compatibility between the two systems. The topic can be anything that comes to the child’s mind and the spelling can also be anything that comes to mind. The seeming freedom is thought to be a boon to the child’s expression and confidence. As many a parent knows, it frequently doesn’t work that way.

Many children, dreading the daily assignment, begin to rely on simple repetitive formulas that they hope will allow them to get by. Often, for example, not knowing what else to do, a child will write about his or her pet. The end product, repeated with slight variations from day to day, is something like “I have a pet. His name is Charley. I like him. We play together.”

After a few days, the teacher will respond with a message such as “I love hearing about your pet but I would love to hear about something else. Can you think of something else in your life that really is important to you?” The child has been anticipating—with butterflies in his or her stomach—this moment. It is the message that always recurs after a certain number of repetitions on the same theme. All the child can do is hope he can get away with his or her ploy for as many days as possible.

The irony is that even when a child writes journal entries "well," they do little or nothing to foster the writing skills that he or she will need both in higher grades in school and in jobs in adult life. Why is that the case? Well, think about it for a moment. What is the essence of journal writing? What is its message?

The answer is that it is a form of personal diary writing where a written record is made that reports on something meaningful that happened to the writer over the course of a day or other period. But for whom is a diary written? Or put another way, who is supposed to read a dairy?

Generally it is only for the writer. It is the self-expression of someone who wants to get his or her ideas down—just because that expression leads to a better sense of well-being or release. They are not designed to be read by anyone else. So when a teacher reviews, edits and comments on them, it is basically an invasion of privacy. And when the teacher, seeing the repetition, requests new content, he or she is essentially making an inappropriate demand. It is a violation of a diary writer’s rights.

From a purely pragmatic view, the practice is also mired in difficulty. The demands of journal or diary writing have little or no similarity to the major set of demands that individuals face in the later school years or in their careers. The type of writing that is required is termed “expository writing.” Basically in this form, the writer is “exposing” or “illuminating” a theme about a subject of importance in the society—whether it is the causes of the Civil War in a middle school class; a critique of the United Nations in a high school class or an analysis of business practices of competing organizations in a job setting. Journal writing offers little, if anything, in the way of training for this type of writing.

Please don’t interpret my message to say that I am against a child keeping a diary. If a child wants to do that, it’s great. Any reasonable activity that a child ELECTS to do should be encouraged. But journal writing in school does not fit this category. It is not an activity that the child has chosen to do. It is an IMPOSED activity that uses up time and fails to teach what the children need to learn.

So what is a parent to do? It is, of course, not feasible for parents to create the writing curriculum that schools have failed to create. But there are a number of things you can do that are manageable and have enormous payoff.

Here is one activity you can try with children from about third grade on. It is well known that artists learn a tremendous amount about their craft from (intentionally) copying other artists. The same is true of writing. Imitating the construction of well-formed ideas is invaluable.

Take a newspaper article that fits the child's reading level. It might be something as esoteric as the New York Times or the Los Angeles Times or it might be something like New for You http://www.news-for-you.com --an excellent paper for young children. First have the child read the article. Then help him or her over any points that are unclear. Then select one of the paragraphs. At the outset, it should be a relatively short paragraph of no more that three to four sentences.

Ask the child to read the paragraph again. Then cover it and ask him or her to “recreate” the set of ideas. This need not be a word for word recreation–but all the key ideas need to be included in well-formed sentences.

If, in the middle of the writing, the child needs to go back and look at the paragraph, allow that to happen. However, when it does, the child has to start the writing again—from scratch. In order for these writing skills to develop, it is essential that the child be able to deal with a set of ideas--and not ideas separated one from the next. If you allow him or her to deal with one sentence at a time, a key element in effective expository writing is nipped in the bud.

If you do this activity twice weekly for a sustained period of time (e.g., six months), you will begin to see major changes in your child’s writing abilities. Of course, the atmosphere has to be supportive. If it ends up as a yelling bout or with lots of preaching, it will be of little benefit. But if you can put the time aside and commit yourself to this, the effects are amazing. Not only do your child’s writing skills flourish, but the regular interactions lead to interesting, illuminating exchanges which enhances your relationship with your child.


December 04, 2008

So That's What Vocabulary Is Like

Want to get a feel for what kids experience when they have to learn "vocabulary" in school--when they have to memorize new meanings, when they have write sentences for each new and unfamiliar word?

You can get a sense by tackling this list of 20 unusual English words. Not only do they have pronunciation rules that are even stranger than the ones we typically have to deal with, but their meanings are far from familiar. If you want the experience to be a more "genuine," you can try "writing three sentences for each word."

1. Erinaceous
Like a hedgehog

2. Lamprophony
Loudness and clarity of voice

3. Depone
To testify under oath

4. Finnimbrun
A trinket or knick-knack

5. floccinaucinihilipilification
Estimation that something is valueless. Proper pronunciation based on
Latin roots: flockə-nowsə-nəkələ-pələ-fək-ation.

6. Inaniloquent
Pertaining to idle talk

7. Limerance
An attempt at a scientific study into the nature of romantic love.

8. Mesonoxian
Pertaining to midnight

9. Mungo
A dumpster diver - one who extracts valuable things from trash

10. Nihilarian
A person who deals with things lacking importance (pronounce the
‘h’ like a ‘k’).

11. Nudiustertian
The day before yesterday

12. Phenakism
Deception or trickery

13. Pronk
A weak or foolish person

14. Pulveratricious
Covered with dust

15. Rastaquouere
A social climber

16. Scopperloit
Rude or rough play

17. Selcouth
Unfamiliar, rare, strange, marvelous, wonderful. For example: The List
Universe is such a selcouth website!

18. Tyrotoxism
To be poisoned by cheese

19. Widdiful
Someone who deserves to be hanged

20. Zabernism
The abuse of military power or authority. I wonder how long it will
take for this one to show up in the comments.

If you'd like to play around with more lists on unnecessary, but intriguing information, go to
http://listverse.com/

Copyright (c) 2007 Darjon Learning, Inc. All rights reserved.
Legal Return Policy Contact Us